moving_from_rhel_to_centos_or_oracle_linux
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
moving_from_rhel_to_centos_or_oracle_linux [2020/05/22 17:27] – [Deciding on a Migration Target] sgriggs | moving_from_rhel_to_centos_or_oracle_linux [2020/05/22 17:41] – sgriggs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
So, consider these scenarios: | So, consider these scenarios: | ||
- | - You are tired of every system needing a subscription even to have basic package functionality. Solution: Just update to any other Linux distro (or BSD) from Red Hat except for SuSE Enterprise (which has some of the same problems). | + | - You are tired of every system needing a subscription even to have basic package functionality. |
- | - You want a way to escape from Redhat without doing a huge dump-and-load migration on every box. Solution: Upgrade to Oracle Enterprise Linux. They have a tool that will convert Red Hat machines into OEL machines [[https:// | + | - You want a way to escape from Redhat without doing a huge dump-and-load migration on every box. **Solution:** Upgrade to Oracle Enterprise Linux. They have a tool that will convert Red Hat machines into OEL machines [[https:// |
+ | - You want better choices for advanced filesystems. Solution: Move to Debian, Devuan, Ubuntu Server, or FreeBSD and use either ZFS-on-Linux (or native ZFS in FreeBSD) or migrate to BTRFS when it stabilizes. Also, see if you might be able to get a specific feature by combining [[https:// | ||
+ | - You want to move to a distro with a stable upgrade path. **Solution: | ||
+ | ===== Benefits of Migration ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | At this point, it's very difficult to recommend Red Hat's products. There are a few exceptions where they have little or no competition, | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Smaller costs and lower cost growth for non-production environments. | ||
+ | - More stability and some insulation from Red Hat's historically poor decisions. | ||
+ | - Direct and permanent open Internet access to your basic package repos without hassle-servers (Uh, I mean caching servers ala Satellite & Spacewalk). | ||
+ | - More stable upgrade paths between major versions | ||
+ | - Access to advanced storage technology Red Hat doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Personally, I'd also include "the satisfaction of telling your ultra-rude & aggressive salesperson that you no longer even run Redhat and please stop calling and threatening to audit or otherwise hassle you." In my personal case, I had around 600 RHEL machines convert to Oracle Enterprise Linux and Red Hat's only response was to threaten to do a forced software audit. Since we'd completely migrated every machine, it would have been a very short audit (as in "Would you like a cup of coffee before you go?", but they never actually did it (probably because they knew they had no leg to stand on). |
moving_from_rhel_to_centos_or_oracle_linux.txt · Last modified: 2020/06/03 16:55 by sgriggs